<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>analysis on Atomic Energy</title>
    <link>/tags/analysis/</link>
    <description>Recent content in analysis on Atomic Energy</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 05:58:19 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/tags/analysis/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Hidden Dangers of Interim Solutions</title>
      <link>/2015/05/05/the-hidden-dangers-of-interim-solutions/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 05:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>/2015/05/05/the-hidden-dangers-of-interim-solutions/</guid>
      <description>One of the hardest challenges in business is knowing when to use an interim solution and when to start over from scratch.
From a pure financial perspective, interim solutions almost always win out. I see this regularly in the software industry. The progress looks something like this:
 You (i.e. your company) write a piece of software. It is successful and useful and sells and grows. Over time, you add more and more features and capabilities, leading to a more useful but more complex product.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
